ArticleNeurogenetics2025
Genotypic and clinical phenotypic analysis of DEPDC5 gene mutations.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutations in the DEPDC5 gene are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and can lead to various clinical phenotypes, including focal seizures. While numerous case reports on DEPDC5 mutations exist, functional validation studies remain scarce. We analyzed seven cases of epilepsy or developmental disorders caused by DEPDC5 mutations, summarizing their clinical manifestations and conducting genetic analysis of the mutation sites. The age of onset in the seven patients ranged from 2 months to 4 years. Six mutation sites were identified, including three nonsense mutations: c.1443del (p.C481X), c.2512 C > T (p.R838X), and c.2620 C > T (p.R874X); one missense mutation: c.1140 C > A (p.F380L); and two splice-site mutations: c.2802-13 C > G (splicing) and c.4034-2 A > G (splicing). Among these, c.2512 C > T (p.R838X) and c.2620 C > T (p.R874X) had been previously reported, while the remaining mutations were novel. Minigene experiments confirmed that the c.4034-2 A > G mutation resulted in a slightly truncated protein.Focal seizures were the predominant symptom in six cases. Among the four patients with nonsense mutations, three (Cases 2, 4, and 5) exhibited drug-resistant epilepsy. Four out of seven patients responded effectively to lacosamide treatment. DEPDC5 mutations can cause focal seizures, with truncating mutations associated with more severe symptoms. Lacosamide may offer better therapeutic outcomes. The intronic mutation c.463 + 4 A > G (splicing) led to protein truncation and was determined to be pathogenic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40100487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.