Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100448›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2025

Introducing alternative nonlinear models to characterize growth curves in goats.

Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Navid Ghavi Hossein-ZadehDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran. navid.hosseinzadeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-5860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By applying some alternative nonlinear functions (such as the sinusoidal, Canter, and Lomolino), this study aimed to introduce these functions in research on the weight development of goats using goat growth data from the literature and their comparison with some routinely used growth models such as Monomolecular, Bridges, Janoschek, Von Bertalanffy, Richards, Schumacher, Morgan, and weibull. During the fitting of nonlinear regression curves, model performance was evaluated and model behavior was examined. The data used in this study came from two published articles reporting (i) body weight records on 120 male Beetal goats recorded at monthly intervals from birth to one year of age, and (ii) body weight records of 50 male South African non-descript indigenous goats. The adjusted coefficient of determination, root mean square error, Akaike's information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion were used to evaluate each model's overall goodness-of-fit to different data profiles. The models typically provided a good fit to the data, as evidenced by the generally high adjusted coefficient of determination values for each model. The selected sinusoidal equation accurately describes the dynamics of goat growth. Among the most effective functions for describing age-related fluctuations in goat body weight was the sinusoidal equation, which was found when comparing growth functions using the fitting criteria. Overall, this study offers implications for advancing research on goat production systems and provides insightful information on the application of alternative nonlinear models, particularly the sinusoidal equation, in modeling goat growth.

Indexed as

GoatsModels, BiologicalAnimalsBayes TheoremBody WeightMaleNonlinear DynamicsSouth AfricaGoatGoodness of fitGrowth functionGrowth rateModel fitting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.