Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100397›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

CT-based scores for extramural vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis correlate with gastric cancer survival.

Qingwan Li, Zhaojuan Jiang, Yun Zhu, Siwei Lu, Jinqiu Ruan, Yanli Li, Keyu Mao, Jing Ai, Yongzhou Xu, YuTing Liao and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Qingwan Li *Department of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200092, Shanghai, China.
Zhaojuan Jiang *Department of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Yun Zhu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, 650032, Kunming, China.
Siwei LuDepartment of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200092, Shanghai, China.
Jinqiu RuanDepartment of Radiology, The People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, 675000, Chuxiong, Yunnan, China.
Yanli LiDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Keyu MaoDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Jing AiDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Yongzhou XuPhilips Healthcare, 510220, Guangzhou, China.
YuTing LiaoPhilips Healthcare, 510220, Guangzhou, China.
Guangjun YangDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Yu XieDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China.
Depei GaoDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China. gaodepei311@sohu.com.
Yanni HuangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China. huangyanni@kmmu.edu.cn.
Zhenhui LiDepartment of Radiology, Yunnan Cancer Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, 650118, Kunming, China. lizhenhui@kmmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-2588

Funding

Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project, Ministry of Education 2023Y0819Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biodiversidade e Produtos Naturais 82001986National Natural Science Foundation of China 82360345the Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of Yunnan Basic Research Project 202101AW070001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of scoring extragastric vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the correlation between these scores and patient prognosis.

methods587 GC patients with CT scans from two centers, all confirmed by pathology, were retrospectively evaluated. Scores for CT-detected blood vessel invasion (ctBVI), lymphatic invasion (ctLVI), and occult peritoneal metastasis (ctOPM) were assigned based on preoperative CT images. The patients' follow-up provided data on overall and disease-free survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

resultsThe inter-group and intra-group consistency of ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were all > 0.70. Log-rank analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves (p < 0.001). CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified ctBVL, ctLVI, ctOPM scores as independent risk factors for GC prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the three sign scores were related to DFS (p < 0.05), with ctBVL (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), ctLVI (HR = 1.502, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), and ctOPM (HR = 1.182, 95% CI: 0.886-1.578). The three scores were also correlated with OS (p < 0.05), ctBVL (HR = 2.003, 95% CI: 1.278-3.139), ctLVI (HR = 1.523, 95% CI:1.055-2.200) and ctOPM (HR = 1.289, 95% CI: 1.013-1.770).

conclusionCtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores are valuable prognostic indicators in gastric cancer, influencing both OS and DFS. KEY POINTS: Question To study whether the ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores assessed by preoperative enhanced CT imaging can predict the survival outcomes of patients. Findings CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores, assessed via preoperative enhanced CT imaging, are associated with worse survival outcomes when elevated. Clinical relevance CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores may help guide personalized follow-up plans. Patients with higher scores might require closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment.

Indexed as

Peritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRetrospective StudiesExtramural vascular invasionGastric cancer, Computed tomographyOccult peritoneal metastasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.