ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
International medical graduate orthopaedic residents show higher research productivity than United States graduate peers before and during residency.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInternational Medical Graduates (IMGs) have lower match rates than their United States (U.S.)-trained Doctor of Allopathic Medicine (MD) and Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) peers. This study aims to more completely elucidate the research accomplishments required for IMGs to match into orthopaedic residency and to compare their academic productivity during residency to that of U.S. MD and DO graduates.
methodsData from orthopaedic-related journals and ACGME-accredited residency programs were extracted in July of 2024 using Python. Variables included: residency year, publications, first-author publications, citations, journals, h-index, medical school type, and the medical school and residency program locations.
resultsPrior to residency, the 56 matched IMGs had a mean of 32.8 publications, 9.8 first-author publications, and 517.1 citations. Matched U.S. MDs had an average of 3.7 publications, 1.1 first-author publications, and 61.0 citations while DO matched applicants had an average of 3.7 publications, 1.0 first-author publications, and 5.6 citations. During residency, IMG orthopaedic residents averaged 5.2 publications per year and 16.6 citations per year. U.S. MD residents averaged 1.3 publications per year and 3.6 citations per year, while DO residents averaged 0.55 publications per year and 1.1 citations per year. The h-index averaged 9.8 for IMGs, 2.2 for U.S. MDs and 0.7 for DOs. All comparisons for IMGs vs. U.S. MDs and IMGs vs. DOs yielded P < 0.0001.
conclusionThese findings highlight the significant differences in research output between IMGs and their U.S.-trained counterparts in orthopaedic surgery, and show that these differences continue throughout residency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40100391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.