ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Genetic architecture and genomic prediction for yield, winter damage, and digestibility traits in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) using genotyping-by-sequencing data.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic selection in timothy (Phleum pratense L.): a comprehensive evaluation of prediction models, multi-trait strategies, and forward validation across Norwegian environments.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageAccurate prediction of genomic breeding values for Timothy was possible using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Timothy (Phleum pratense L.) is a grass species of great importance for Finnish agricultural production systems. Genotyping-by-sequencing along with genomic prediction methods offer the possibility to develop breeding materials efficiently. In addition, knowledge about the relationships among traits may be used to increase rates of genetic gain. Still, the quality of the genotypes and the validation population may affect the accuracy of predictions. The objectives of the study were (i) to estimate variance components for yield, winter damage and digestibility traits, and (ii) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions. Variance components were estimated using genomic residual maximum likelihood where the genomic relationship matrix was scaled using a novel approach. Genomic breeding values were estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction in single- and multiple-trait settings, and for different marker filtering criteria. Estimates of heritability ranged from 0.13 ± 0.03 to 0.86 ± 0.05 for yield at first cut and organic matter digestibility at second cut, respectively. Genetic correlations ranged from -0.72 ± 0.12 to 0.59 ± 0.04 between yield at first cut and winter damage, and between digestibility at first and second cuts, respectively. Accuracy of prediction was not severely affected by the quality of genotyping. Using family cross-validation and single-trait models, predictive ability ranged from 0.18 to 0.62 for winter damage and digestibility at second cut, respectively. In addition, validation using forward prediction showed that estimated genomic breeding values were moderately accurate with little dispersion. Thus, genomic prediction constitutes a valuable tool for improving Timothy in Finland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.