ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
The impact of multi-modality fusion and deep learning on adult age estimation based on bone mineral density.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAge estimation, especially in adults, presents substantial challenges in different contexts ranging from forensic to clinical applications. Bone mineral density (BMD), with its distinct age-related variations, has emerged as a critical marker in this domain. This study aims to enhance chronological age estimation accuracy using deep learning (DL) incorporating a multi-modality fusion strategy based on BMD.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 4296 CT scans from a Chinese population, covering August 2015 to November 2022, encompassing lumbar, femur, and pubis modalities. Our DL approach, integrating multi-modality fusion, was applied to predict chronological age automatically. The model's performance was evaluated using an internal real-world clinical cohort of 644 scans (December 2022 to May 2023) and an external cadaver validation cohort of 351 scans.
resultsIn single-modality assessments, the lumbar modality excelled. However, multi-modality models demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by lower mean absolute errors (MAEs) and higher Pearson's R² values. The optimal multi-modality model exhibited outstanding R² values of 0.89 overall, 0.88 in females, 0.90 in males, with the MAEs of 4.05 overall, 3.69 in females, 4.33 in males in the internal validation cohort. In the external cadaver validation, the model maintained favourable R² values (0.84 overall, 0.89 in females, 0.82 in males) and MAEs (5.01 overall, 4.71 in females, 5.09 in males), highlighting its generalizability across diverse scenarios.
conclusionThe integration of multi-modalities fusion with DL significantly refines the accuracy of adult age estimation based on BMD. The AI-based system that effectively combines multi-modalities BMD data, presenting a robust and innovative tool for accurate AAE, poised to significantly improve both geriatric diagnostics and forensic investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40100354What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.