Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100348›Full record

Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in type 1 diabetes-results from an observational study.

Jakob Starup-Linde, Julie Støy, Pernille Bundgaard Grinderslev, Bente Langdahl, Torben Harsløf

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jakob Starup-LindeDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. jakolind@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-8023
Julie StøySteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Pernille Bundgaard GrinderslevDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bente LangdahlDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Torben HarsløfDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of osteoporosis in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) was investigated. Based on IOF/ADA recommendations, 36% had indications for anti-osteoporotic therapy. We propose that postmenopausal women and men with T1D and age > 50 years are screened for osteoporosis. PURPOSE: Type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased fracture risk and a lowering of the threshold for osteoporosis treatment has been recommended to be increased from a bone mineral density of a T-score ≤ - 2.5 to a T-score ≤ - 2.0. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for osteoporosis in type 1 diabetes using the classic diagnostic criteria defined by WHO and the novel T-score cutoff of - 2.0 proposed by the ADA.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, data were collected from the type 1 diabetes clinic at Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, where active attenders in the clinic were offered screening for osteoporosis using DXA of the lumbar spine and hip in the time period 2020-2022.

resultsA total of 764 individuals with type 1 diabetes had a DXA and of these, 25.5% had osteoporosis based on a vertebral fracture or T-score ≤ - 2.5, and 36% met ADA-treatment criteria with a vertebral fracture or T-score ≤ - 2.0. In multivariate analysis increasing age (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.0; 1.7) and a family history of osteoporosis (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2; 3.0) were associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, whereas an increase in BMI was associated with a decreased risk of osteoporosis (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.82; 0.92).

conclusionThe present study finds that a high proportion of individuals with type 1 diabetes have osteoporosis, and an even higher proportion meet the treatment criteria proposed by the ADA, and thus, early detection and treatment of osteoporosis may reduce the apparent increased fracture risk in type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1OsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHip JointHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesAnti-osteoporotic treatmentBone mineral densityComplianceOsteoporosisType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40100348
PMCPMC12089193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.