ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
A framework for analyzing EEG data using high-dimensional tests.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bidirectional Mamba-2 boosts EEG super-resolution via regression and diffusion.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe objective of EEG data analysis is to extract meaningful insights, enhancing our understanding of brain function. However, the high dimensionality and temporal dependency of EEG data present significant challenges to the effective application of statistical methods. This study systematically addresses these challenges by introducing a high-dimensional statistical framework that includes testing changes in the mean vector and precision matrix, as well as conducting relevant analyses. Specifically, the Ridgelized Hotelling's T2 test (RIHT) is introduced to test changes in the mean vector of EEG data over time while relaxing traditional distributional and moment assumptions. Secondly, a multiple population de-biased estimation and testing method (MPDe) is developed to estimate and simultaneously test differences in the precision matrix before and after stimulation. This approach extends the joint Gaussian graphical model to multiple populations while incorporating the temporal dependency of EEG data. Meanwhile, a novel data-driven fine-tuning method is applied to automatically search for optimal hyperparameters.
resultsThrough comprehensive simulation studies and applications, we have obtained substantial evidence to validate that the RIHT has relatively high power, and it can test for changes when the distribution is unknown. Similarly, the MPDe can infer the precision matrix under time-dependent conditions. Additionally, the conducted analysis of channel selection and dominant channel can identify significant channels which play a crucial role in human cognitive ability, such as PO3, PO4, Pz, P4, P8, FT7, and FT8. All findings confirm that the proposed methods outperform existing ones, demonstrating the effectiveness of the framework in EEG data analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and data used in the article are available at https://github.com/yahu911/Framework_EEG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.