ArticleHealth economics review2025
Measuring productivity in the healthcare sector: a bibliometric and content analysis.
Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of Medical Associate Professions (MAPs) on the productivity, quality of care, patient and healthcare workforce satisfaction, and budget implications in various healthcare settings: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Scientific Clinical Trial Publication Productivity in Medical Oncology: A Comparative Analysis and Data Review of Northern and Southern Italy.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Behavioral Modeling in Weight Management: A Global Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Health Belief Model Applications.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Financing Regimes and Case-Mix Complexity in Psychiatric Hospitals Beyond the Pandemic Shock-Insights from a Regional European Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Behavioral responses of healthcare providers to prospective payment systems: a systematic review using the WHO framework (2000-2024).Health economics review · 2026Review
- From Individual Behavior to Systemic Insight: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of COM-B Applications in Responsible Consumption.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProductivity in the healthcare sector has evolved as an appealing research topic in the last few years. Despite the growing interest, the extant scientific literature mostly concentrates on methodologies rather than theoretical and practical insights. Although diverse methodologies provide valuable quantitative wisdom, their application is often misaligned with broader economic theories or healthcare purposes, limiting their contribution to advancing theoretical and practical understanding of efficiency and productivity in healthcare systems. In this respect, the current study endeavors to bridge the research gap concerning the lack of a comprehensive overview of productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.
methodsWe investigate this concern through a bibliometric and content analysis of articles published on healthcare productivity measurement techniques in the Web of Science database between 2003 and 2023. We provide a quantitative and critical analysis of conceptualization, methods, findings, and implications of the selected published articles concerning productivity measurements in the healthcare sector.
resultsOur research discovered that the sanitary crisis generated by COVID-19 boosted the publication of scientific papers on productivity measurements in healthcare, with Europe emerging as a leading region in publication output. Although Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Index monopolize the range of measurement techniques used to quantify productivity, current research highlights the requirement for alternative methodologies to grasp the multidimensionality of healthcare productivity, including its interaction with quality and technological progress.
conclusionsWe raise awareness that future efforts should prioritize multidimensional and context-sensitive approaches to measuring healthcare productivity, balancing efficiency, technological progress, and quality of care. Policymakers should focus on designing context-specific policies tailored to regional challenges and promoting targeted research funding to explore underrepresented areas of healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.