ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Preoperative MRI-based predictive model for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of changes in prediction modelling in biomedicine using systematic reviews.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine the biochemical recurrence (BCR)-related pelvic anatomic characteristics before radical prostatectomy (RP) and to establish a new predictive model for BCR-free survival (BCRFS).
methodsThe study involved 170 patients who underwent RP between January 2015 and December 2022. Kaplan-Meier plots were applied to estimate survival probabilities. Multivariate Cox regression models were employed to identify predictors for BCRFS, which were subsequently incorporated into an MRI-based nomogram to visualize the model. The Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was employed to evaluate the discrimination, and compared with a basic model without incorporating pelvic anatomy. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to identify the advantage of the new predictive model. Three risk categories were created.
resultsMultifactorial analysis revealed that age, capsule contact length (CCL), tumor's distance to the proximal membranous urethra (UD), urethral width, and annual surgery volume were independent risk factors for BCR (all p < 0.05). The established predictive model yielded a C-index of 0.850 that was superior to aforementioned basic model with C-index of 0.771 (p < 0.001). Our new model with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.893 revealed better predictive ability in BCRFS than basic model with the AUC of 0.823 (p = 0.01), and DCA demonstrated that our model generated more net benefits.
conclusionUD and urethral width are independent predictors of BCRFS. Our new model exhibits superior predictive accuracy with respect to BCRFS relative to the basic model. Apart from tumor features, pelvic anatomical features should also be considered before the treatment decision making of PCa patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40100279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.