ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
How to Design, Create, and Evaluate an Instruction-Tuning Dataset for Large Language Model Training in Health Care: Tutorial From a Clinical Perspective.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise of Small Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey.Computer science review · 2026Article
- Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Natural language processing models for patient-centered summaries of prostatectomy pathology reports.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence Methodology Reporting in Otolaryngology: A Scoping Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- A roadmap for medical large language models: a review of foundations, applications, and challenges.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Assessing Patient Education Materials for Colorectal Cancer Generated by Four Large Language Models: Readability, Quality, and Transparency Challenges.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-quality data are critical in health care, forming the cornerstone for accurate diagnoses, effective treatment plans, and reliable conclusions. Similarly, high-quality datasets underpin the development and performance of large language models (LLMs). Among these, instruction-tuning datasets (ITDs) used for instruction fine-tuning have been pivotal in enhancing LLM performance and generalization capabilities across diverse tasks. This tutorial provides a comprehensive guide to designing, creating, and evaluating ITDs for health care applications. Written from a clinical perspective, it aims to make the concepts accessible to a broad audience, especially medical practitioners. Key topics include identifying useful data sources, defining the characteristics of well-designed datasets, and crafting high-quality instruction-input-output examples. We explore practical approaches to dataset construction, examining the advantages and limitations of 3 primary methods: fully manual preparation by expert annotators, fully synthetic generation using artificial intelligence (AI), and an innovative hybrid approach in which experts draft the initial dataset and AI generates additional data. Moreover, we discuss strategies for metadata selection and human evaluation to ensure the quality and effectiveness of ITDs. By integrating these elements, this tutorial provides a structured framework for establishing ITDs. It bridges technical and clinical domains, supporting the continued interdisciplinary advancement of AI in medicine. Additionally, we address the limitations of current practices and propose future directions, emphasizing the need for a global, unified framework for ITDs. We also argue that artificial general intelligence (AGI), if realized, will not replace empirical research in medicine. AGI will depend on human-curated datasets to process and apply medical knowledge. At the same time, ITDs will likely remain the most effective method of supplying this knowledge to AGI, positioning them as a critical tool in AI-driven health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.