Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100267›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Prompt Framework for Extracting Scale-Related Knowledge Entities from Chinese Medical Literature: Development and Evaluation Study.

Jie Hao, Zhenli Chen, Qinglong Peng, Liang Zhao, Wanqing Zhao, Shan Cong, Junlian Li, Jiao Li, Qing Qian, Haixia Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jie Hao *Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7208-7443
Zhenli Chen *Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9664-085X
Qinglong PengQingdao Innovation and Development Center, Harbin Engineering University, Qingdao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2545-1344
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6505-290X
Wanqing ZhaoInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3705-5737
Shan CongQingdao Innovation and Development Center, Harbin Engineering University, Qingdao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-7678
Junlian LiInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1028-0235
Jiao LiInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-8343
Qing QianInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9072-586X
Haixia SunInstitute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1652-5335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement-based care improves patient outcomes by using standardized scales, but its widespread adoption is hindered by the lack of accessible and structured knowledge, particularly in unstructured Chinese medical literature. Extracting scale-related knowledge entities from these texts is challenging due to limited annotated data. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in named entity recognition (NER), specialized prompting strategies are needed to accurately recognize medical scale-related entities, especially in low-resource settings.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and evaluate MedScaleNER, a task-oriented prompt framework designed to optimize LLM performance in recognizing medical scale-related entities from Chinese medical literature.

methodsMedScaleNER incorporates demonstration retrieval within in-context learning, chain-of-thought prompting, and self-verification strategies to improve performance. The framework dynamically retrieves optimal examples using a k-nearest neighbors approach and decomposes the NER task into two subtasks: entity type identification and entity labeling. Self-verification ensures the reliability of the final output. A dataset of manually annotated Chinese medical journal papers was constructed, focusing on three key entity types: scale names, measurement concepts, and measurement items. Experiments were conducted by varying the number of examples and the proportion of training data to evaluate performance in low-resource settings. Additionally, MedScaleNER's performance was compared with locally fine-tuned models.

resultsThe CMedS-NER (Chinese Medical Scale Corpus for Named Entity Recognition) dataset, containing 720 papers with 27,499 manually annotated scale-related knowledge entities, was used for evaluation. Initial experiments identified GLM-4-0520 as the best-performing LLM among six tested models. When applied with GLM-4-0520, MedScaleNER significantly improved NER performance for scale-related entities, achieving a macro F

conclusionsMedScaleNER advances the application of LLMs and prompts engineering for specialized NER tasks in Chinese medical literature. By addressing the challenges of unstructured texts and limited annotated data, MedScaleNER's adaptability to various biomedical contexts supports more efficient and reliable knowledge extraction, contributing to broader measurement-based care implementation and improved clinical and research outcomes.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingChinaAIartificial intelligenceChinaChinese medical literaturedatasetframeworkin-context learninginformation retrievallarge language modelLLMMBCmeasurement-based caremedical literatureMedScaleNERnamed entity recognitionpromptprompt engineeringprompt frameworkretrievalscale

Identifiers

PMID40100267
PMCPMC11962316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.