ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Prompt Framework for Extracting Scale-Related Knowledge Entities from Chinese Medical Literature: Development and Evaluation Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Named entity recognition for coal mining machine assembly based on domain large language model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Enhanced Drug Repositioning Knowledge Extraction via Long Chain-of-Thought: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasurement-based care improves patient outcomes by using standardized scales, but its widespread adoption is hindered by the lack of accessible and structured knowledge, particularly in unstructured Chinese medical literature. Extracting scale-related knowledge entities from these texts is challenging due to limited annotated data. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in named entity recognition (NER), specialized prompting strategies are needed to accurately recognize medical scale-related entities, especially in low-resource settings.
objectiveThis study aims to develop and evaluate MedScaleNER, a task-oriented prompt framework designed to optimize LLM performance in recognizing medical scale-related entities from Chinese medical literature.
methodsMedScaleNER incorporates demonstration retrieval within in-context learning, chain-of-thought prompting, and self-verification strategies to improve performance. The framework dynamically retrieves optimal examples using a k-nearest neighbors approach and decomposes the NER task into two subtasks: entity type identification and entity labeling. Self-verification ensures the reliability of the final output. A dataset of manually annotated Chinese medical journal papers was constructed, focusing on three key entity types: scale names, measurement concepts, and measurement items. Experiments were conducted by varying the number of examples and the proportion of training data to evaluate performance in low-resource settings. Additionally, MedScaleNER's performance was compared with locally fine-tuned models.
resultsThe CMedS-NER (Chinese Medical Scale Corpus for Named Entity Recognition) dataset, containing 720 papers with 27,499 manually annotated scale-related knowledge entities, was used for evaluation. Initial experiments identified GLM-4-0520 as the best-performing LLM among six tested models. When applied with GLM-4-0520, MedScaleNER significantly improved NER performance for scale-related entities, achieving a macro F
conclusionsMedScaleNER advances the application of LLMs and prompts engineering for specialized NER tasks in Chinese medical literature. By addressing the challenges of unstructured texts and limited annotated data, MedScaleNER's adaptability to various biomedical contexts supports more efficient and reliable knowledge extraction, contributing to broader measurement-based care implementation and improved clinical and research outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.