ArticleJMIR formative research2025
A Trauma Support App for Young People: Co-design and Usability Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and User-Centered Evaluation of Smart Systems for Loneliness Monitoring in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most common reasons young people with mental health issues, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, do not seek help is stigma, which digital support tools could help address. However, there is a lack of trauma support apps specifically designed for young people. Involving the target group in such projects has been shown to produce more engaging and effective results.
objectiveThis study aimed to apply a child rights-based participatory approach to develop a trauma support app with young people.
methodsSeven young people (aged 14-19 years; 3 males and 4 females) with experiences of trauma were recruited as coresearchers. A child rights-based framework guided the working process. The app was developed through a series of Design Studio workshops and home assignments, using the manualized intervention Teaching Recovery Techniques as the foundation for its content. The coresearchers were trained in research methodology and conducted usability testing with other young people (n=11) using the think-aloud method, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and qualitative follow-up questions.
resultsA functional app prototype was developed using a no-code platform, incorporating various trauma symptom management techniques. These techniques covered psychoeducation, normalization, relaxation, and cognitive shifting, presented in multiple formats, including text, audio, and video. The contributions of the coresearchers to the design can be categorized into 3 areas: mechanics (rules and interactions shaping the app's structure), dynamics (user-visible elements, such as the outcome when pressing a button), and aesthetics (the emotional responses the app aimed to evoke in users during interaction). Beyond influencing basic aesthetics, the coresearchers placed significant emphasis on user experience and the emotional responses the app could evoke. SUS scores ranged from 67.5 to 97.5, with the vast majority exceeding 77.5, indicating good usability. However, usability testing revealed several issues, generally of lower severity. For instance, video content required improvements, such as reducing light flickering in some recordings and adding rewind and subtitle selection options. Notably, the feature for listening to others' stories was removed to minimize emotional burden, shifting the focus to text formats with more context.
conclusionsYoung people who have experienced trauma can actively participate in the cocreation of a mental health intervention, offering valuable insights into the needs and preferences of their peers. Applying a child rights-based framework to their involvement in a research project supported the fulfillment of the Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.