Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100215›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Secondary Rectal Cancer After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Dana M Omer, Farheen Shah, Anisha Luthra, Chin-Tung Chen, Christina I Lee, Hannah Williams, Henry Walch, Floris S Verheij, Roni Rosen, Janet Alvarez and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Dana M OmerDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Farheen ShahDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anisha LuthraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Chin-Tung ChenDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christina I LeeDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Hannah WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Henry WalchDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Floris S VerheijDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Roni RosenDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Janet AlvarezDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Canan FiratDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Georgios KaragkounisDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Martin R WeiserDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maria WidmarDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Iris H WeiDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Emmanouil P PappouDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Garrett M NashDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
J Joshua SmithDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Walid K ChatilaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Paul B RomesserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jinru ShiaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Philip B PatyDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Julio Garcia-AguilarDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Francisco Sanchez-VegaDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
Investigating the contribution of cellular senescence to the efficacy of radiation therapy.K08CA255574 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ROMESSER, PAUL BERNARD · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA255574NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) have increased risk of secondary rectal cancer (SRC) and more limited treatment options. Objective: To assess the tumor molecular profile, clinical characteristics, and oncologic outcomes of SRC after PC and compare them with those of primary rectal cancer (PRC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study included patients with SRC diagnosed 5 or more years after RT for PC and patients with PRC who were treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York between February 1, 1994, and September 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical information and DNA sequencing data were analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with SRC and clinically matched patients with PRC using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Numerical and categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test, respectively. Results: The analysis included 604 male patients with PRC (71.6%; median age, 55 [IQR, 46-66] years) and 64 male patients with SRC (median age, 78 [IQR, 72-82] years). Patients with SRC had more distal rectum (37 of 63 [58.7%] vs 131 of 581 [22.5%]; P < .001) and anterior rectal wall (20 of 57 [35.1%] vs 67 of 496 [13.5%]; P < .001) tumors, were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (33 of 64 [51.6%] vs 570 of 604 [94.4%]), and had shorter 5-year overall survival (45.7% vs 64.9%; P = .01) and disease-free survival (40.3% vs 71.2%; P = .006) compared with clinically matched patients with PRC. Targeted DNA sequencing data from 31 SRC tumors identified lower mutational burden (median, 4.4 [IQR, 3.2-6.7] per megabase [Mb] vs 5.8 [IQR, 4.4-7.0] per Mb; P = .047), lower frequency of APC alterations (15 [48.4%] vs 432 [79.9%]; P < .001), and higher rates of SMAD4 inactivation (8 [25.8%] vs 54 [10.0%]; P = .01) compared with 541 PRC tumors. Whole-exome sequencing data from 17 SRC tumors identified a higher rate of frameshift deletions compared with 28 PRC tumors (median, 5.0 [IQR, 4.0-9.0] vs 2.5 [IQR, 1.0-4.2] variants; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, patients with SRC after RT for PC had worse survival and different molecular profiles than patients with PRC. These findings may help improve the clinical management of SRC.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Radiation-InducedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryProstatic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40100215
PMCPMC11920846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.