Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100213›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Hospital Security Searches Among Patients With Substance-Related Encounters.

Sarah J Nessen, Ashish Thakrar, Jeanmarie Perrone, Lin Xu, Rachel McFadden, Margaret Lowenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah J NessenPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Center for Emergency Care and Policy Research, Penn Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, Philadelphia.
Ashish ThakrarDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Jeanmarie PerroneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Penn Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Lin XuDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Rachel McFaddenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Penn Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Margaret LowensteinDivision of General Internal Medicine, Penn Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Funding

Improving transitions of care for hospitalized patients with opioid use disorderK23DA055087 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Margaret Lowenstein · 2022 to 2026
$959k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA055087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hospital clinicians may request that security personnel search patients' rooms and belongings in response to suspected possession or use of illicit substances. Although searches are intended to protect patient and employee safety, little is known about search outcomes or consequences for clinical care. Objective: To investigate the clinical context and outcomes of room searches among patients with substance-related hospital encounters. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of security incident reports and electronic health record data for patients with substance-related hospital encounters between July 2021 and July 2023 at an urban, academic hospital with approximately 1000 beds in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants were adults with International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes consistent with substance use disorders, chief concerns of drug overdose or withdrawal, and/or positive verbal screenings for opioid use who had emergency department visits or inpatient hospitalizations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were search requests, items confiscated, and patient-directed discharges (PDDs). Secondary measures centered on the clinical context of searches, including location and receipt of medications for opioid use disorder. Results: There were 13 827 total substance-related hospital encounters over the study period involving 6985 unique patients (median [IQR] age, 47 [34-58] years; 3863 [55.3%] male; 3688 [52.7%] Black; 302 [4.3%] Hispanic; 2597 [37.2%] White). Over this time, security reported 576 room search requests, among which 457 (79.3%) were requests for searches among patients with substance-related hospital encounters. Nurses requested most searches (376 searches [82.3%]), and 195 searches (43.6%) resulted in no items confiscated. Confiscated items included syringes and unspecified paraphernalia (129 searches [28.9%]), confirmed or suspected drugs and alcohol (102 searches [22.8%]), tobacco products (54 searches [12.1%]), and pipes and smoking materials (53 searches [11.9%]). Patients who had 1 or more search requests during a substance-related hospital encounter had a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) of having a PDD compared with patients who did not undergo searches (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.32-3.86). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with substance-related hospital encounters, most searches did not result in the confiscation of illicit substances, and searches were associated with PDDs. There is an overall need for clear, patient-centered hospital search protocols that support both staff and patient well-being.

Indexed as

Security MeasuresSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40100213
PMCPMC11920837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.