Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40100202›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Changes in Lens Thickness and Power Before and After Myopia Onset.

Jiaqing Zhang, Ling Jin, Qianyun Chen, Decai Wang, Xiang Chen, Yuting Li, Yabin Qu, Rong Lin, Mingguang He, Ian G Morgan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiaqing ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ling JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qianyun ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Decai WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiang ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuting LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yabin QuGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Rong LinSchool Health Unit, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Mingguang HeSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Ian G MorganResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Lixia LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yangfa ZengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaotong HanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate changes in the crystalline lens before and after the onset of myopia. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Participants were initially emmetropic or hyperopic at baseline and were followed for 5 years, during which they were categorized into two groups: those who developed myopia (newly developed myopes [NDM]; n = 1669) and those who remained hyperopic or emmetropic (persistent nonmyopes [PNM]; n = 4259). Changes in spherical equivalent refraction (SER), axial length, lens thickness, and lens power were analyzed from 5 years before to 4 years after myopia onset. Age-related trends in SER and biometric parameters were compared between the PNM and NDM groups. Results: The mean age of the included children at baseline was 7.61 ± 2.68 years (range, 3-14 years), with 3272 boys (55.20%). Compared with the PNM group, the NDM group exhibited a faster myopic refraction shift, accelerated axial elongation, and a more rapid reduction in lens thickness and power. Changes in SER and axial length peaked at 1 year before myopia onset (P < 0.001), but lens thickness and power remained relatively stable before myopia onset. The rate of change in SER and biometric parameters all slowed after myopia onset. In the PNM group, lens thickness decreased before age 11 and increased thereafter, whereas lens power decreased continuously, with a slower rate of decline after 11 years of age. Conclusions: SER and axial length demonstrate accelerated changes 1 year before myopia onset, whereas lens thickness and power remain largely stable before and after myopia onset, with changes primarily associated with age.

Indexed as

Lens, CrystallineMyopiaRefraction, OcularAdolescentAxial Length, EyeBiometryChildChild, PreschoolChinaDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40100202
PMCPMC11927298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.