ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery2025
Natural Asymmetry in Hair Growth Direction: Implications for Hairline Design in Male Patients.
Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAchieving a natural, aesthetically pleasing hairline is a key objective in hair transplant surgery. However, many patients erroneously assume that perfect symmetry between the left and right sides of the hairline is crucial for natural results. This misconception neglects the natural asymmetry in facial structures, including hairlines. This study quantifies the degree of asymmetry in hairline direction among male subjects, providing evidence to guide hairline design for optimal outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study included 125 East Asian males with Norwood-Hamilton stage II or lower, none of whom had undergone hair restoration surgery. Standardized 60-degree photographs were used to minimize distortion, and hair growth angles were measured using Microsoft Snip & Sketch's protractor tool. Measurements were taken at specific points along the hairline, and paired t tests were performed to assess asymmetry.
resultsSignificant rightward asymmetry in hairline direction was found, averaging 22.2 degrees. The mean hair angle on the right side was 55.03 degrees, whereas the left averaged 32.83 degrees (P < 0.001). Only 8.8% of subjects exhibited greater leftward asymmetry.
conclusionThis study highlights the prevalence of natural asymmetry in male hairlines, particularly a rightward skew. Symmetrical hairline designs may appear unnatural, whereas embracing this asymmetry can lead to more harmonious results. Educating patients about these findings can enhance satisfaction. Further research should explore the impact of sex, ethnicity, and skull morphology on hairline asymmetry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.