ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Evaluation of dosimetric and spatial accuracy of a virtual cone technique for radiosurgery using linac-integrated CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of dosimetric and spatial accuracy of a virtual cone technique for radiosurgery using linac-integrated CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the dosimetric and geometric precision of a virtual cone technique using CBCT-based polymer gel dosimetry, enabling radiation delivery, and imaging readout within an identical spatial coordinate system.
methodsWe created a C# script for a virtual cone technique that generates a treatment plan with 10 gantry arcs at 0°, 36°, 72°, 288°, and 324° couch angles, with 2 arcs per couch angle using 45° and 135° collimator angles. Two verification plans using Eclipse v15.6 (AcurosXB) were created with 20 Gy at the maximum dose for: (1) a cylindrical gel, with an additional calibration region; (2) a 3D printed anthropomorphic skull phantom with a gel insert. The 50% isodose (10 Gy) width through the central axis of the axial and sagittal planes (SPs) were measured for the gel experiment. The distance between the centers-of-masses of the 10 Gy isodose region of the plan and the gel (skull phantom) were calculated for an end-to-end spatial accuracy test.
resultsThe maximum point dose measured with gel was within 1% of the plan, though the gel measured 50% isodose widths of 5.56
conclusionThe 50% isodose width of the gel measurement was 5.15 mm (mean), which was tighter than our Eclipse v15.6 beam model. The end-to-end spatial accuracy test, only achievable with gel dosimetry using CBCT readout, resulted in sub-millimeter accuracy. This study demonstrates the value of gel dosimetry in verifying the dosimetric and spatial accuracy of this high precision, stereotactic technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.