ArticleJournal of health organization and management2025
Clinical leadership development in the NHS - a study in urgent and emergency care (UEC).
Article in Journal of health organization and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper explores why clinicians in an emergency department (ED) become leaders, their experiences of leadership and their future developmental needs. It focuses on emerging leaders, middle management, and senior management whilst addressing the knowledge gap in identifying the training needs of clinical leadership in urgent and emergency care (UEC). DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This study utilised both surveys (
findingsThe findings revealed that most clinical leaders received insufficient training to prepare them to be leaders in UEC. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study was originally intended for a single English Acute Trust, rendering the data limiting, as an interpretivist study. The fact that three Trusts were used for the semi-structured interviews helped with the triangulation of data. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The paper proposes an original leadership development framework for UEC to support leaders who are often excellent clinicians, to be equally brilliant and appropriately empowered leaders. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: A more individual-centric focus on clinical leadership development is advocated, offering an original leadership development framework to support leadership development and contributing to the wider literature on education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.