ReviewInternational journal of radiation biology2025
Potential biomarkers of chronic low-dose radiation exposure for nuclear medicine technologists.
Review in International journal of radiation biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microarray-Based Genomic Profiling in Low-Dose Radiation Research: Evidence, Limitations, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Low-dose X-Ray induced genetic damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNuclear medicine is the fastest growing segment in imaging due to an increase in demand for procedures, development of advanced scanners and new radioactive tracers. Technologists are exposed to radiation throughout the workday. Key protection approaches are time, distance, and shielding; these can be difficult to achieve since patients are usually the main source of radiation and close contact is required. Technologists in general nuclear medicine receive annual effective doses of approximately 0.1 mSv. Doses in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can be close to 6 mSv. Without appropriate radiation protection measures, finger doses from handling PET radiopharmaceuticals can exceed the annual dose limit of 500 mSv. Estimates of health risks from low dose-rate exposures are extrapolated from risk coefficients calculated from Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Effects of chronic exposure are obtained from nuclear workers and radiotherapy patients. This review aims to consolidate existing research in biomarkers of low dose radiation exposure to determine whether they may form a part in occupational health monitoring.
conclusionsThe link between chronic low-dose exposure in nuclear medicine technologists and health risks using radiation-related biomarkers as a proxy remains relatively unexplored. Further work is needed to identify and characterize biomarkers in technologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.