ArticleSocial studies of science2025
Making modafinil: Classification and serendipity in drug development.
Article in Social studies of science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How does a compound become a drug, and how do we decide for whom the drug is intended? Building a history of modafinil, this article examines how classification and serendipity affect drug development. We explore how mental health categories interact with drug development by tracing: how compound CRL40,476 was inadvertently created while exploring other compounds, and then became a focal point for development efforts; and how it secured Schedule IV status (low potential for abuse), orphan drug status (for niche markets), and then blockbuster drug status (>$1bn in annual sales). Classification of modafinil and its uses were negotiated under conditions of uncertainty, requiring substantial efforts to align interests across a wide array of institutions. We highlight these contingencies to show the considerable efforts that go into finding, and creating, markets for drug development. Taking these efforts for granted may confuse invention with innovation and is likely to lead to understatement of the costs and choices involved in drug development, particularly where mental health categories are concerned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.