Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099887›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2026

Why conserve genetic diversity? A perspective based on a case study with a European conifer.

Bruno Fady, Caroline Scotti-Saintagne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruno FadyINRAE, Ecology of Mediterranean Forests (URFM), Avignon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2379-7617
Caroline Scotti-SaintagneINRAE, Ecology of Mediterranean Forests (URFM), Avignon, France.

Funding

French Occitanie region
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiodiversity is the variability among living organisms that exists within species, between species and of ecosystems. Nonetheless, genetic diversity, the within-species component of biodiversity, is rarely considered as a conservation concern or goal in protected areas. SCOPE: In this perspective, we explore possible reasons why genetic diversity is poorly considered in conservation and ecological restoration. We also present the case study of a threatened forest conifer in France [Pinus nigra ssp. salzmannii (Dunal) Franco, Salzmann's pine] that we offer as proof of how straightforward implementation of genetic diversity conservation goals can be in protected areas.

conclusionsScientific studies in the fields of either conservation or biodiversity consider genetics in <10 % of scientific publications. Although genetic tools are used for taxonomic delineation, concerns about diversity within species at the population level appear comparatively rare in conservation and biodiversity science or management. The use of genetic tools for the conservation of genetic diversity of Salzmann's pine in France clarified its taxonomic status, identified populations relevant for in situ conservation compatible with habitat conservation and made it possible to select genetically original individual trees that could be grafted as a core collection for dynamic ex situ conservation. As threats to biodiversity increase worldwide, fully integrating genetic diversity in conservation demands that conservation adopts an evolutionarily centred, nature-for-itself perspective, rather than either an anthropocentric, resource-focused perspective or a bio-centred, emblematic species-focused perspective.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationPinusBiodiversityEcosystemEuropeFranceBiodiversitycore collectionevocentric model of conservationevolutionin situ conservationPinus nigra Arnoldprotected area

Identifiers

PMID40099887
PMCPMC13409146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.