Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099833›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2025

Thermal temporal summation has good reliability in the lumbar region.

Max Jordon, Matthew Grubb, Jessica Hackathorne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max JordonPhysical Therapy, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
Matthew GrubbPhysical Therapy, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
Jessica HackathorneOccupational Therapy, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTemporal summation (TS) via a thermal stimulus is a form of dynamic quantitative sensory testing that is often used as an indirect measure of central sensitization. While TS is frequently used as an outcome measure to assess the effectiveness of various interventions, the reliability of this measure has yet to be fully assessed in the lumbar spine. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reliability of TS using a thermal stimulus at the lumbar spine (LS). The secondary purpose was to compare the thermal TS values in the LS to that of the tibialis anterior (TA) and the thenar eminence (TE).

methodsAdults with no activity limiting pain conditions between the ages of 18 and 40 were recruited to participate in this study. TS was measured following a series of heat-pulses administered by the Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer-II system. After undergoing an optimization session, TS was taken at the LS, the muscle belly of the TA, and the TE, all on the right side. A second thermal TS measurement was taken once again a week later.

resultsA total of 25 ( DISCUSSION/

conclusionThermal TS taken at the LS is a reliable measure with ICC values that are comparable to ICC values found at the TA and the TE.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionPain MeasurementPain ThresholdAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultlow back painmechanisms of treatmentquantitative sensory testingTemporal summationthermal stimulus

Identifiers

PMID40099833
PMCPMC12459156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.