ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Prevalence of Aspirin or Clopidogrel Pharmacological Resistance in Ischemic Stroke: A Step Toward Precision Medicine.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke patients with early neurological deterioration: a meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Reassessing Antiplatelet Resistance in Ischemic Stroke: Addressing Key Gaps in Precision Medicine Research.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesCurrently, there is not sufficient data regarding the prevalence of resistance or inadequate platelet function inhibition with the use of antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardioembolic stroke. This study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of antiplatelet inactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in the setting of chronic use and presentation with primary or recurrent stroke.
methodsPatients who were taking aspirin, clopidogrel, or both at the time of presentation for stroke were selected in this study. Those with confirmed stroke on MRI or clinically determined TIA and age > 18 years were included. A standard laboratory test, VerifyNow aspirin or P2Y12 assay, was utilized to assess the responsiveness to the platelet inhibitors. A total of 158 patients were identified, 52 presenting with primary stroke and 106 with recurrent stroke. Data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact as well as t-test analysis.
resultsOf the primary stroke population, 4% of patients demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 30% to clopidogrel. Of the patients presenting with recurrent stroke, 13% demonstrated resistance to aspirin and 38% to clopidogrel. The data also suggest increased resistance to aspirin and clopidogrel in Caucasians compared to minorities, with 11% versus 8% in regard to aspirin and 33% versus 17% to clopidogrel. Additionally, this study demonstrated 17% resistance to aspirin in males compared to 4% in females and 13% in males compared to 36% in females, respectively, regarding resistance to clopidogrel. No difference in inactivity to either aspirin or clopidogrel was detected between patients with stroke mechanisms of small or large vessel disease.
conclusionsThe present result demonstrated that a sizeable portion of the population has inefficacious activity in the setting of specific antiplatelet agents. Additionally, sex and ethnicity differences in responsiveness to aspirin or clopidogrel have been noted. Determining a patient's response to medications could provide opportunities to individualize treatment and better prevent future strokes. Further studies of a larger scale are indeed needed to apply this information to pursue individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.