Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099804›Full record

Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025

The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients With Cognitive Impairment: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, and Sham Control Trial.

Wensi Zheng, Xiaojie Zhang, Jingjiong Chen, Xinghua Luan, Jijun Wang, Liren Zhang, Kun Liu, Yuwu Zhao, Zhouwei Xu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wensi ZhengShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojie ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingjiong ChenDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xinghua LuanDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jijun WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liren ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kun LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuwu ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhouwei XuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-9987

Funding

Shanghai Sailing program 20YF1436400Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan 23DZ2291500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease. A large number of ALS patients have cognitive impairment. In this double-blinded, randomized, and sham-controlled study, we aimed to investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on ALS patients with cognitive impairment.

methodsA total of 90 ALS patients with cognitive impairment were recruited from two cohorts; 80 participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 10 Hz rTMS or sham treatment on the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFC) for 4 consecutive weeks. The patients were assessed by ECAS and ALSFRS-R scales. The Zarit care burden scale was administered to caregivers of ALS patients. The primary outcome measured was the rate of decline in the total ECAS score between pretreatment, 6 months post-treatment, and 12 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the group difference in the slope of the Zarit score, ALSFRS-R total score, and the neurofilament light chain plasma levels.

resultsThe ECAS total score in the intention-to-treat population significantly changed from 79.74 ± 6.39 to 81.98 ± 6.51 and 79.22 ± 6.50 with rTMS intervention at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, respectively (p = 0.031, p = 0.042). The Zarit score also significantly decreased from 57.65 ± 3.42 to 52.24 ± 3.34 and 56.42 ± 3.41 at the 3-month and 6-month post-treatment time points, respectively (p = 0.003, p = 0.014). No significant differences were observed between the groups for other secondary endpoints. However, there was a trend of decreasing NF-L level rates in the treatment group over the first 6 months' follow-up.

conclusionsrTMS could yield short-term positive effects on the ALS patients subgroup with cognitive impairment and alleviate caregivers' burden. No improvement was observed in the severity of ALS and ALS plasma biomarkers.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCognitive DysfunctionDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomeamyotrophic lateral sclerosiscaregiver's burdencognitive impairmentprognosistranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40099804
PMCPMC11915350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.