Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099669›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2025

What Is a Good Death in South Asia? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Lihini Wijeyaratne, Odette Spruijt, Saroj Jayasinghe, Sumit Kane, Udayangani Ramadasa, Jennifer Philip

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lihini WijeyaratneFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-870X
Odette SpruijtFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Saroj JayasingheFaculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka.
Sumit KaneMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Udayangani RamadasaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Ratnapura, Sri Lanka.
Jennifer PhilipFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo deliver palliative care, it is important to understand what a "good death" means to the relevant people. Such studies have mostly occurred in high-income settings that usually live by Western ideals. What matters to people is likely to vary across different regions of the world, influenced by multiple factors. Although there is a great need for palliative care in South Asia, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of what a good death means in this setting. This study aimed to increase understanding of what is considered a good death in South Asia.

designSystematic review and narrative synthesis.

methodA systematic search was conducted across eight databases, an Advanced Google search, and a bibliography search of selected articles. A data-based convergent synthesis was performed, along with quality appraisal.

resultsTwenty-five empirical studies were selected for analysis from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan. Four themes emerged. Mutual care and connection support a continued sense of self: contributing to others, while receiving connection through relationships and spiritual practices, was important for patients and supported by families and healthcare workers. Freedom to choose-privilege or burden?: the choice to participate in care was necessary for some patients but a burden for others, who preferred the family to lead their care. Severe uncontrolled pain and financial distress precluded choice for some patients, who felt death was the only option. Decisions regarding artificial prolongation of life were complex for patients and healthcare workers. Opportunities in the last days: when actively dying, there was general agreement on the importance of being pain-free, feeling safe, and having family present. Home was not always the preferred place of death. For family, it was critical to perform last rites. After death matters: What happens after death-influenced by leaving a legacy and religious beliefs-affected all parties before, during, and post-death.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first review of what a good death means in South Asia. There is a dearth of research from most South Asian countries. Although the South Asian perspective has similarities with the Western perspective, we note important nuances around decision-making, prolongation of life, prognostic awareness, and wanting to end one's life, moderated by culture, religion, and poverty. We support policies that account for these variations. Ongoing work is required to provide good symptom management, thus increasing opportunities for patient participation in care. Further research is needed in areas of ethics and religion at the end of life in South Asia.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathPalliative CareAsiaAsia, SouthernHumanscaregiversgood deathhealthcare workerspalliative carepatientsreviewSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID40099669
PMCPMC12241761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.