Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099657›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2025

Whose Role Is It Anyway? Beneficiary Engagement During the Transition to Medicaid Managed Care in North Carolina.

Monisa Aijaz, Paula H Song, Valerie A Lewis, Christopher M Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monisa AijazUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2998-8641
Paula H SongVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Valerie A LewisUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Christopher M SheaUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empowering beneficiaries to choose a health plan that meets their health needs during the transition to Medicaid managed care is critical to promote informed decision-making. This study uses North Carolina's transition under the 1115 waiver to examine the role of the state, health plans, and providers in informing beneficiaries about the transition. We reviewed policy documents and interviewed 43 individuals representing provider practices and 10 representing the State Department of Health and Human Services and health plans between December 2020 and September 2021. Interviewees from the state described strategies to encourage beneficiaries to select a health plan. Participating practices shared that their patients were unaware or confused about the transition. These concerns led practices to engage beneficiaries and contract with all health plans to ensure continuity of care, contributing to administrative burdens. While the state made significant efforts to engage beneficiaries, the interaction between beneficiaries and providers was still critical.

Indexed as

Managed Care ProgramsMedicaidPatient ParticipationTransitional CareContinuity of Patient CareHumansNorth CarolinaUnited Statesbeneficiary engagementenrolleesimplementationMedicaid managed carepolicy reformqualitative

Identifiers

PMID40099657
PMCPMC12414101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.