ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2025
Feasibility and Reliability of a Monitoring App for Chronic Inflammatory Neuropathies.
Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMultifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) are immune-mediated neuropathies characterized by muscle weakness and/or sensory deficits. Identifying treatment response, relapse, and stability can be challenging in these chronic, sometimes unpredictable, conditions. This study explores the potential of a monitoring app designed to address these challenges.
methodsPatients were monitored weekly or monthly, based on stability and patient preference, using grip strength, modified timed-up-and go (mTUG), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User experience was evaluated via a questionnaire addressing content and ease of use (scale 0-10). Adherence was measured as the percentage of completed mandatory assessments. We investigated reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard errors of the mean (SEM) of repeated measurements. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.
resultsWe included 38 patients, with a mean follow-up of 11 months (IQR 4.6-19.5). The mean user experience score was 8.35/10 (range 7-10). Adherence was 93% (95% CI: 91.9%-94.1%). Reported remote measurements for grip strength were 1358/1468 (93%), and 1343/1430 (94%) for mTUG. Grip strength and mTUG ICCs were both 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98 and 0.92-0.99, respectively). The average SEM was 8.46% (95% CI: 6.58-10.28) for grip strength and 8.18% (95% CI: 6.12-10.41) for mTUG. Only grip strength changed significantly, increasing by 3.1 pounds per 6 months (95% CI: 0.61-5.83; p = 0.016).
interpretationOur study demonstrates that tele-neuromonitoring is feasible and reliable, showing high adherence, positive user experience and high ICCs. We anticipate tele-neuromonitoring could complement routine follow-up, enabling clinicians to make better-informed treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.