Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099615›Full record

Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Impact of rehabilitation in the neurointensive care unit on long-term survival in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Kristin Alvsåker, Rolf Hanoa, Jon Michael Gran, Lisa Maria Högvall, Carl Johan Fredstedt Sogn, Halvard Cartfjord Bech, Theresa Olasveengen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristin AlvsåkerPostoperative and Intensive Care Department, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4421-8824
Rolf HanoaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.
Jon Michael GranNorwegian Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6964-4969
Lisa Maria HögvallPostoperative and Intensive Care Department, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-0396
Carl Johan Fredstedt SognDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.
Halvard Cartfjord BechDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.
Theresa OlasveengenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-3129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to compare the difference in long-term mortality in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) receiving Early interdisciplinary rehabilitation (EIR) in our Neurointensive Care Unit (NICU) to patients being discharged from NICU without EIR.

methodsRetrospective observational cohort study of adults aged 18-67 years with moderate to severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-14), admitted to the NICU for >72 h from 2010 to 2022. We analyzed mortality differences from the start of follow-up (cessation of sedation in the Standard of care (SC) group and start of EIR in the EIR group) until 31.12.2023, using inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Adjustments using weights were made for various variables, including age, days from injury to follow-up start, sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and injury characteristics.

resultsA total of 698 patients were included, 461 received EIR and 237 SC. Sixty-three (27%) patients in the SC group and 59 (13%) patients in the EIR group died by the end of follow-up. In covariate-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves, estimated survival at the end of follow-up was 56% (95% CI 0.36, 0.69) for the SC group and 74% (95% CI 0.58, 0.83) for the EIR group. Both groups had the highest mortality rate within 30 days. The mortality in the EIR group was significantly lower with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) at 30 days of 0.57 (95% CI 0.37, 0.87) p-value = .010, and at the end of follow-up of 0.56 (95% CI 0.36, 0.89), p-value = .015.

conclusionsPatients receiving EIR had better long-term survival, with both groups experiencing the highest mortality rate early on. Early rehabilitation in NICU may play an important role in preventing and identifying medical complications and should be explored as a potential mechanism in future prospective trials. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Neurorehabilitation following intensive care for traumatic brain injury is important to help the patients regain function. However, it is uncertain whether survival is improved by the initiation of interdisciplinary rehabilitation already during neurointensive care, consisting of mobilization and training activities of daily living as well as swallowing. This study compared long-term survival in a retrospective cohort of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury and found that those receiving early rehabilitation had a higher long-term survival, which persisted for up to 13 years but was mainly due to improved survival during the first 3 months. Whether this is due to physiological effects or an increased enthusiasm among healthcare providers to continue active treatment is unknown and should be further explored.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultinterdisciplinary rehabilitationmortalityneuro‐intensive caresurvivaltraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40099615
PMCPMC11915480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.