ArticleJournal of experimental botany2025
Interspecies predictions of growth traits from quantitative transcriptome data acquired during fruit development.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linking genotype and phenotype is a fundamental challenge in biology. In this respect, machine learning is playing a pivotal role in systems biology. As central phenotypic traits, fruit development and relative growth rate (RGR) result from interactions between gene regulation, metabolism, and environment. In the present study, we carried out a multispecies transcriptomic analysis of nine different fruits. To illustrate fruit transcriptomes, transcripts were first compared using multivariate methods, revealing similar main profiles. They were then used as variables to predict four growth traits, that is RGR, developmental progress, fruit weight, and protein content, using generalized linear models to decipher the mechanisms involving gene expression in development. The predictions were highly satisfactory despite disparities when the model did not include the entire panel of fruit species. Based on orthogroups derived from BLAST and annotated consensus sequences from gene ontology terminology, variables annotated for metabolic processes, especially those involving cell wall carbohydrates and proteins, were found to be the most effective in predicting growth. In addition, predictions were improved for RGR when introducing a 7 d lag between transcript contents and growth traits, suggesting the necessity of considering the proteins produced to enhance phenotypic trait predictions. These original results showed that growth traits can be predicted very well with generalized linear models based on orthogroups from multi-species transcriptomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.