ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Minimizing stroke risk in off-pump CABG: the role of clampless devices and the piggyback proximal anastomosis technique.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved Cardiac Function and Glycemic Control in Elderly Diabetic Patients Through Structured Case Management After CABG.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Acute mitral regurgitation following giant coronary artery aneurysm resection: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Preemptive ImpellaBiomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous techniques have been developed to minimize risk of perioperative stroke during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), including off-pump approach, preoperative and intraoperative imaging of the ascending aorta (CT scan and epiaortic ultrasound), anaortic CABG with bilateral internal thoracic artery, clampless devices for the construction of proximal anastomosis and minimal aortic manipulation with a single aortic inflow for all proximal grafts (piggyback proximal anastomosis). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CABG patients who underwent off pump CABG with proximal anastomosis constructed with the use of a clampless device and in a piggyback fashion. Methods: This observational study included 112 consecutive patients undergoing CABG with the piggyback proximal technique at the Lankenau Heart Institute between June 2021 and January 2024. Primary endpoints included overall mortality, cardiac-related mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement (TTFM) was also analyzed. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 67.8 ± 8.7 years, with 75.9% (85/112) being male. All patients underwent off-pump CABG. The piggyback anastomosis consisted of vein-on-vein (52.7%, 59/112), artery-on-vein (43.8%, 49/112), and double vein/artery configurations (3.6%, 4/112). Postoperatively, no strokes occurred. At 30 days no patient died or required repeat revascularization. The mean hospital stay was 5.5 [4.0-8.0] days. At a mean follow-up of 1.0 [0.5-1.7] years, no cardiac deaths were recorded, with an overall survival of 98.2% (110/112). Repeat piggyback revascularization was 3.6% (4/112) at a mean of 2.0 ± 0.5 years. TTFM demonstrated superior flow rates in artery-on-vein grafts [50 (40-70) ml/min] compared to vein-on-vein grafts [40 (30-53.5), Conclusions: When a proximal anastomosis cannot be avoided during off pump CABG, the combination of a piggyback proximal anastomosis together with the use of a clampless aortic device, demonstrated promising early mid-term outcomes almost nullifying the perioperative risk of clinical stroke. Intraoperative TTFM showed excellent flow rates, especially when arterial grafts were used. The technique is a viable option in high-risk patients with severe aortic disease, offering a safe and effective approach to multivessel revascularization with minimal aortic manipulation. Further studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm its long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.