Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099246›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis during eras of evolving diagnostic criteria-a nationwide population-based registry study over five decades.

Anna Maunula, Sini M Laakso, Matias Viitala, Merja Soilu-Hänninen, Marja-Liisa Sumelahti, Sari Atula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna MaunulaTranslational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-0554
Sini M LaaksoTranslational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-2849
Matias ViitalaStellarQ Ltd, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2854-2410
Merja Soilu-HänninenClinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6930-0229
Marja-Liisa SumelahtiFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-0483
Sari AtulaHUS Neurocenter, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1293-9325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Impact of changing diagnostic criteria for the population-based incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been investigated. Objective: To assess the effect of changing diagnostic criteria on national MS incidence and prevalence in Finland from 1974 to 2021. Methods: We identified patients with MS (pwMS) through the National MS registry and the national Care Register for Healthcare and divided them into four groups based on the year of MS diagnosis: 1) Schumacher criteria (1974-1982), 2) Poser criteria (1983-2000), 3) Earlier McDonald criteria (2001-2016), and 4) Current McDonald criteria (2017-2021). Age-adjusted incidence and prevalence were calculated. Results: Age-adjusted incidence per 10 Conclusion: Both incidence and prevalence of MS increased significantly. Incidence showed a sharp increase when entering the twenty-first century, after which it stabilized. Increasing incidence was likely related to incorporation of MRI in the diagnostic criteria. Current diagnostic criteria did not further increase the incidence.

Indexed as

diagnostic criteriaepidemiologyincidenceMSMultiple sclerosisprevalence

Identifiers

PMID40099246
PMCPMC11912163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.