Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099196›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Proteasome dynamics in response to metabolic changes.

Cordula Enenkel, Oliver P Ernst

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cordula EnenkelDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Oliver P ErnstDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteasomes, essential protease complexes in protein homeostasis, adapt to metabolic changes through intracellular movements. As the executive arm of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, they selectively degrade poly-ubiquitinated proteins in an ATP-dependent process. The primary proteasome configuration involved in this degradation is the 26S proteasome, which is composed of a proteolytically active core particle flanked by two regulatory particles. In metabolically active cells, such as proliferating yeast and mammalian cancer cells, 26S proteasomes are predominantly nuclear and actively engaged in protein degradation. However, during nutrient deprivation or stress-induced quiescence, proteasome localization changes. In quiescent yeast, proteasomes initially accumulate at the nuclear envelope. During prolonged quiescence with decreased ATP levels, proteasomes exit the nucleus and are sequestered into cytoplasmic membraneless organelles, so-called proteasome storage granules (PSGs). In mammalian cells, starvation and stress trigger formation of membraneless organelles containing proteasomes and poly-ubiquitinated substrates. The proteasome condensates are motile, reversible, and contribute to stress resistance and improved fitness during aging. Proteasome condensation may involve liquid-liquid phase separation, a mechanism underlying the assembly of membraneless organelles.

Indexed as

metabolic regulation of proteasome localizationproteasome condensates in membraneless organellesproteasome storage granulesprotein homeostasis (proteostasis)ubiquitin 26S-proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID40099196
PMCPMC11911490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.