ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2024
[What do doctors suggest to improve coordination between levels? Results in six Latin American countries].
Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the strategies for improving clinical coordination proposed by primary care (PC) and secondary care (SC) doctors from the public healthcare networks in six Latin American countries, and the changes between 2015 and 2017. Methods: Two cross-sectional studies based on surveys (2015 and 2017) were developed with the application of the COORDENA questionnaire to a total of 4 311 primary and secondary care doctors from two public healthcare networks in each country. A descriptive analysis of the proposed suggestions was carried out stratified by country and year. Results: In all countries, the introduction or improvement of strategies and mechanisms that ease interaction and mutual knowledge between professionals from different care levels is noted, especially joint cross-level meetings, direct communication mechanisms and strategies to strengthen the use of the referral and back-referral form. Less frequently, other organisational strategies are suggested aimed at strengthening the primary care model, access to secondary care and the coordination of the network's management. Conclusions: The results allow to generate recommendations for the improvement of clinical coordination in different health systems drawn from the suggestions made by doctors, a perspective that is seldom considered in the design and implementation of interventions in healthcare services. The need to promote strategies based on mutual adjustment in the development of public health policies is highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.