Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099160›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

The fundamental importance of social insurance for health equity.

Seth A Berkowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seth A BerkowitzDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-4297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People need to consume goods and services that support health, such as nutritious food, medical care, and quality housing, throughout their lives. Many of these goods and services are allocated using markets, which means that people need income to provide purchasing power for these goods and services. However, everyone has times when supporting themselves through paid labor is not possible, so many individuals will not receive the income needed for a healthy life if income distribution is tied solely to economic production. Therefore, a key political economy of health goal is to put in place income-support policy that gets income to those unable to engage in paid labor. The 3 main forms of income-support policy-social assistance, social insurance, and guaranteed income-offer different strengths and limitations. I argue that social insurance, because of its focus on getting income to people in situations in which they cannot or should not engage in paid labor, is a fundamental part of a political economy that supports everyone's health.

Indexed as

incomesocial determinants of healthsocial insurancesocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40099160
PMCPMC11909629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.