Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099134›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Role of risk perceptions and vaccine hesitancy on decision-making among low-income mothers in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Stephen Gichuhi Kimotho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen Gichuhi KimothoCommunication, United States International University, Nairobi, Kenya, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-6819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstracts: Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy among mothers in low-income communities in Kenya presents a serious obstacle to achieving successful childhood immunisation. The aim of this study was to explore the determinants of vaccine hesitancy among mothers from low-income rural communities, risk perceptions associated with vaccines and how these factors influence decision-making regarding their children's immunisation. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in three counties in Kenya (Murang'a, Kiambu and Machakos) using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with mothers of children under 5 years. Participants were purposively sampled from low-income rural communities and were mothers attending postnatal clinics at various health facilities. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and subthemes, coding of transcripts, identification of patterns and organisation of themes into categories. Results: Several critical factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy among mothers regarding their children's immunisation were identified through thematic analysis. Safety concerns emerged as a primary issue, with mothers expressing fears of adverse reactions such as fever, pain, swelling or other unexpected complications. Misinformation significantly influenced perceptions, including beliefs that vaccines might cause infertility or long-term health problems. Distrust in the health system further exacerbated hesitancy, with mothers questioning the quality, administration and motives of vaccinators. Limited vaccine knowledge also played a role, which led to misconceptions about the severity and risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Moreover, sociocultural and religious beliefs influenced decision-making, with some mothers viewing vaccines as unsafe or ineffective, driven by cultural norms, reliance on traditional remedies or religious objections. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the complexities of vaccine hesitancy among mothers in low-income communities in Kenya. Furthermore, the results emphasise the complex nature of hesitancy, driven by an interplay of safety concerns, misinformation, distrust, limited knowledge, and sociocultural and religious influences. Addressing these determinants requires interventions that would prioritise clear and accurate communication about vaccine safety, engagement with community and religious leaders, and strengthening trust in healthcare providers and systems. Additionally, enhancing vaccine knowledge through targeted health education programmes would be crucial for empowering mothers to make informed decisions about their children's health.

Indexed as

Community HealthPublic HealthQualitative ResearchVaccination

Identifiers

PMID40099134
PMCPMC11911692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.