Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099131›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Measuring misaligned contraceptive use among reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Brooke W Bullington, Stephanie Chung, Claire W Rothschild, Dickens Onyango, Leigh Senderowicz, Emilia Goland, Abigael Mwanyiro, Ben Wekesa, Brian Frizzelle, Ginger Golub and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contraceptive Concordance.Studies in family planning · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brooke W BullingtonDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3341-087X
Stephanie ChungDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Claire W RothschildPopulation Services International, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Dickens OnyangoKisumu County Department of Health, Kisumu, Kenya.
Leigh SenderowiczDeparment Gender & Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Emilia GolandDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abigael MwanyiroInnovations for Poverty Action Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ben WekesaInnovations for Poverty Action Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brian FrizzelleCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Ginger GolubInnovations for Poverty Action Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Katherine TumlinsonCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
Randomized Controlled Trial to Address Unintended Pregnancy Rates in Low Resource SettingsR01HD101453 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TUMLINSON, KATHERINE M · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Research Training Program in Reproductive and Sexual HealthR25HD115514 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JESSICA N SANDERS, David Turok · 2024 to 2026
$474k
Contraceptive Autonomy: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Developing a Novel Family Planning MeasureK01HD113818 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Leigh Gabrielle Senderowicz · 2024 to 2026
$411k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD113818NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD101453NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD115514NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Global family planning scholars have critiqued traditional measures of programmatic success and called for new, person-centred measures that consider people's preferences. We propose a new measure that assesses the alignment between an individual's contraceptive desires and use. Methods: We use data from a population-based survey implemented among adult reproductive-aged women in Kisumu, Kenya. We define misaligned contraceptive use as discordance between contraceptive desires and use (ie, desire for contraception paired with non-use or no desire for contraception paired with use). We expand misaligned use to incorporate non-preferred contraceptive method use, defined as the use of a method with a preference for a different method among contraceptive users. We also compare unmet need for family planning with misaligned use. Results: In our total sample, including contraceptive users and non-users, 86% of participants had aligned contraceptive use and 14% had misaligned use. Among contraceptive users, we found that 74% of participants had aligned and preferred method use, 21% had aligned and non-preferred method use, 2% had misaligned and preferred use, and 3% had misaligned and non-preferred use. Our comparison of misaligned use and unmet need showed little agreement. Conclusions: Measuring misaligned and non-preferred contraceptive method use has implications for family planning measurement and programming. Our results demonstrate the importance of capturing contraceptive desires rather than assuming an implicit desire for contraception among those who do not desire pregnancy. Further, incorporating method preferences into misaligned use provides additional detail on who does and does not have their contraceptive desires met. Finally, measuring misaligned and non-preferred method use highlights subsets of populations who may benefit from additional contraceptive programming to improve contraceptive access or enable method discontinuation or switching, and therefore can be imperative to ensuring that individuals have their reproductive desires realised.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesEpidemiologic MeasurementsFemalePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40099131
PMCPMC11911701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.