ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2023
Effects of self-management interventions in adults with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of self-management interventions in adults with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The Prisma checklist was used. Embase via Ovid, Lilacs, Medline via PubMed and Central were searched for randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane collaboration guidelines were followed and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (Prisma) statement. The Revman program was used to consolidate the data. A sensitivity analysis was carried out. Results: A total of 17 randomized controlled trials met eligibility criteria. The results showed that self-management interventions did not significantly enhance patients' compliance with medication OR=1.32 (95% CI 0.66-2.64), lifestyle changes OR=1.08 (95% CI 0.55-2.15) and modification of clinical variables MD=-1.77 (95% CI -2.96 6.50). Conclusion: This review suggests that there are no statistically significant differences between self-management interventions and the usual care given to patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Compliance with Pharmacological Treatment, lifestyle changes and Changes in Clinical Variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.