Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025

MetaComBin: combining abundances and overlaps for binning metagenomics reads.

Francesco Tomasella, Cinzia Pizzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco TomasellaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Cinzia PizziDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metagenomics is the discipline that studies heterogeneous microbial samples extracted directly from their natural environment, for example, from soil, water, or the human body. The detection and quantification of species that populate microbial communities have been the subject of many recent studies based on classification and clustering, motivated by being the first step in more complex pipelines (e.g., for functional analysis, de novo assembly, or comparison of metagenomes). Metagenomics has an impact on both environmental studies and precision medicine; thus, it is crucial to improve the quality of species identification through computational tools. Methods: In this paper, we explore the idea of improving the overall quality of metagenomics binning at the read level by proposing a computational framework that sequentially combines two complementary read-binning approaches: one based on species abundance determination and another one relying on read overlap in order to cluster reads together. We called this approach MetaComBin (metagenomics combined binning). Results and Discussion: The results of our experiments with the MetaComBin approach showed that the combination of two tools, based on different approaches, can improve the clustering quality in realistic conditions where the number of species is not known beforehand.

Indexed as

abundanceclusteringk-mersmetagenomicsoverlapreads binning

Identifiers

PMID40099113
PMCPMC11912761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.