ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2023
Experiences of hospital health professionals in the care of deaf patients.
Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the Design of a Sign Language Corpus of Medical Terms for Automatic Translation Systems: Mixed Methods Approach.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Equal access to treatment for hearing loss in Chile: do all people have the same opportunities to receive appropriate treatment? A scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Article
- Communication Barriers and Health Literacy Gaps Undermine Equitable Healthcare for Deaf Sign Language Users: A Qualitative Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the experience of hospital health professionals in the care of deaf patients. Methods: We explored primary qualitative data from the experience of hospital health professionals in caring for deaf patients. A qualitative study with a descriptive phenomenological approach was carried out using face-to-face semi-structured qualitative interviews (N=8). We evaluated the perspective and experience of healthcare professionals caring for a deaf patient through semi-structured interviews (supported by field notes) which were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the Colaizzi Method. Results: Ninety-four significant statements emerged and were grouped into two themes: "professional-patient interaction" and "conditioners of care", each with three categories. The interactions were influenced by factors such as the tools and strategies used by the health professional, their emotions, and the patient's conditions; on the other hand, within the conditioning factors, the professionals described the procedural aspects, environmental and structural factors linked to care and access. Conclusions: The health professionals' experience impacts both themself and the quality of patient care. This impact is associated with different barriers, such as interpersonal, interaction, cultural and language or communicational, which generates inequality in access to health for deaf people and a challenging situation for health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.