ArticleCureus2025
Laparoscopic Excision of Douglas Pouch Fibroma in Contact With the Sigmoid Colon.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic tumors, especially those in difficult locations such as tumors in the rectouterine pouch in contact with the sigmoid colon, pose therapeutic approach difficulties due to the increased risk of complications, such as intestinal perforation. In practice, open surgical technique is often used even though laparoscopy has more advantages, due to lack of familiarity with delicate endoscopic maneuvers. This article describes the laparoscopic excision of a pelvic mass (residual fibroid after a previous myomectomy) implanted in the rectouterine pouch and in contact with the sigmoid colon. The patient is a 49-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic excision of a 10 cm FIGO 4 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage 4) fibroid three years ago. She presented to the outpatient clinic for prenatal care initiation, where the ultrasound revealed a solid mass in the pelvis measuring 6x6 cm. The MRI differential diagnosis at 28 weeks of gestation included sarcoma, ovarian cancer, and fibroid. Cancer markers were negative. Conservative management was decided until delivery. During pregnancy, the mass remained stable in size and morphology. At 39 weeks, a selective cesarean section was performed due to a history of myomectomy, during which the mass was identified between the intestinal loops. The ultrasound three months postpartum depicted the mass measuring 4.5x4.5 cm located in the rectouterine pouch. A laparoscopic approach was decided, during which the mass was initially identified and then dissected from the surrounding tissue using bipolar bovie and laparoscopic scissors. Delicate manipulation was needed when dissecting in order to avoid bowel perforation. The mass was removed from the peritoneal cavity using an endoscopic bag to prevent tissue dissemination. The histological diagnosis was fibroid. This report demonstrates that pelvic tumors in difficult locations like in contact with the sigmoid colon can be safely removed by an experienced laparoscopic surgical team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.