ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in a 40-Year-Old Male Patient: A Challenging Diagnosis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, immune-mediated neutrophilic dermatosis, presenting with painful ulcerative skin lesions. These lesions often start as pustules on an erythematous base, progressing to large ulcers with purulent edges. Diagnosing PG can be challenging, as it lacks definitive tests and requires exclusion of other conditions, including infections and vascular diseases. PG is frequently associated with systemic autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and monoclonal gammopathies. This report describes a case of a 40-year-old Hispanic male patient with recurrent, painful lesions on his lower extremities. Initially misdiagnosed as cellulitis, the patient had a complex history of peripheral vascular disease, which added to the diagnostic difficulty. The patient's history of recurrent ulcerations, persistent post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and rapid response to corticosteroids led to a clinical diagnosis of PG. This case highlights the need for careful differential diagnosis in chronic, non-healing lesions, emphasizing that PG should be considered, particularly in atypical presentations or in patients without common systemic associations. Early recognition and immunosuppressive therapy are crucial to avoid misdiagnosis and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.