ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Analysis of Complications in Early Verses Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute cholecystitis (AC) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal emergencies, necessitating prompt definitive treatment. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for management, although the timing of surgery remains controversial. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) is performed within 72 hours of symptom onset, while delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) is undertaken after a period of conservative management. The purpose of this study is to assess the complications and outcomes of early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.
objectivesTo evaluate perioperative outcomes, including complications, operative time, conversion rates, and hospital stay, between patients undergoing early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective non-randomized comparative study was conducted in the surgical department of Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar. The study was carried out during a 15-month period, from June 1, 2023, to August 30, 2024. A total of 118 individuals with acute cholecystitis, age ranged between 18 to 60 years, were included. Acute cholecystitis was diagnosed based on imaging examinations, laboratory tests, and the patient's history.
resultsIn Group 1, the mean age of patients was 42.5±10.3 years, and it was 44.1±9.8 years in Group 2. Gender distribution was similar in both groups, with a slight predominance of females (Group 1: 35 females, 25 males; Group 2: 34 females, 24 males). In Group 1, the most common presenting symptoms were right upper quadrant pain (55, 92.4%), nausea (47, 78.8%), and fever (27, 45.8%). Similarly, in Group 2, these symptoms were reported in 53 (91.4%), 46 (79.3%), and 27 (46.6%) patients, respectively. Duration of symptoms prior to surgery was 3.2±1.1 days in Group 1 and 4.1±1.3 days in Group 2.
conclusionsIn comparison to delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with fewer complications, fewer readmissions, and shorter hospital stays. These findings have led to the recommendation of early intervention as the best strategy for treating acute cholecystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.