ArticleCureus2025
A Case of Postmenopausal Uterine Adenosarcoma With Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine adenosarcoma is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor that usually arises from the endometrium and presents as a large polypoid mass occupying the endometrial cavity. A correct histopathological diagnosis of adenosarcoma from a small specimen is often difficult, and pre-operative MR imaging findings are generally not specific enough to establish an adenosarcoma diagnosis. A 60-year-old nulliparous woman was referred to our hospital who presented with vaginal bleeding. Her medical history was notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Upon pelvic examination, a large endometrial polyp prolapsing through the cervix and vagina was observed while she was bleeding profusely. We performed a biopsy on the polyp, but the pathological diagnosis showed no malignancy. On MR imaging, the tumor presented both low and high signal intensities on T2WI, low signal intensity on T1WI, and a slightly high DWI signal intensity. Therefore, a prolapsed leiomyoma was suspected, and a hysteroscopic tumor excision was performed. The pathological examination found that the tumor was a uterine adenosarcoma. We thereafter performed an abdominal total hysterectomy with a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The final diagnosis was a uterine adenosarcoma, T1aN0M0. In postmenopausal women with diabetes, where the pathological biopsy findings and imaging of a polypoidal mass with abnormal vaginal bleeding do not lead to a suspected malignant neoplasm, it is still important to remove the tumor and examine it in order to attain a current diagnosis because it may be a rare, low-grade malignant neoplasm, such as an adenosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.