ReviewCureus2025
Past and Present Role of Neurosurgical Interventions in the Management of Psychiatric Disorders: A Literature Review on the Evolution of Psychosurgery.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in psychiatric treatments, many patients with treatment-resistant disorders are turning to neurosurgical interventions. These include neuromodulation-based surgeries such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and ablative surgeries such as cingulotomy, offering relief for severe conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, and substance use disorder. While "psychosurgery" has sparked debate due to concerns about patient well-being, recent studies indicate promising symptom improvement rates across various psychiatric conditions while also demonstrating overall safety. Neuromodulation techniques, such as DBS, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), have evolved in regard to their sensitivity and their ability to target specific brain regions to alleviate psychiatric symptoms. Despite their benefits, these therapies have been shown to elicit side effects such as memory loss and seizures in patients, which has sparked controversy in the use of this technology across clinicians and patients. Ablative therapies, on the other hand, are concerning for being overly invasive in their approach toward psychiatric care. Despite the stigma associated with these neurosurgical interventions for psychiatric care, these procedures often remain a last resort for many patients, highlighting the need for continued research to improve these treatments and expand options for those in need. In this narrative review, we examine the current literature to elicit an understanding of neurosurgical history in regard to psychiatric disorder treatment and its implications for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.