ArticleCureus2025
Cross-Cultural Validation of the Renzi Score for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Renzi obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score is a validated and published method used for the diagnosis and staging of patients with ODS. It consists of a five-item score with a total score ranging from 0 to 20. This study aimed to cross-culturally validate the Renzi ODS score by translating it into Arabic. Methods This prospective study included 30 women who had undergone sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair during the years 2021-2023. The Renzi ODS score was professionally translated from English to Arabic by native speakers, constructed, and validated by five professional and experienced individuals in the study domain for adequate content validity. Data were obtained through a face-to-face interview at baseline and by telephone four weeks later. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to determine the homogeneity of the items, item-total, and item-item correlations, and to assess the impact of each item on internal consistency separately. A simple kappa coefficient for each item was assessed to evaluate test-retest reliability. Results A total of 30 women aged 42-74 years who had undergone sacrocolpopexy were included in this study. Overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all items indicated that the five items have enough homogeneity in the Renzi ODS score. Inter-item correlations showed a high degree of correlation across all items, which indicates a strong association between each item and the total score of the Renzi ODS. For test-retest reliability, results indicated good to excellent reliability of the Renzi ODS score. Conclusions This study validated the Arabic Renzi ODS score, confirming its role as a reliable and consistent tool for evaluating ODS in patients after sacrocolpopexy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.