ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Use of artificial intelligence for reverse referral between a hospital emergency department and a primary urgent care center.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The demand for immediate care in emergency departments (EDs) has risen since the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Objective: Test the ability of AI to promote reverse referral and to provide patient education. Methods: Pilot study that included patients presenting to our Hospital Emergency Department (HED) with a non severe disease and who met the inclusion criteria. The participants were asked to answer a series of questions using an electronic device and receive a recommendation for health attention. Then, patients could choose to either remain in the hospital or leave. Results: 427 patients finally participated in the pilot study. Within this population, 49.5% were women, and the mean patient age was 37.5 years. Mediktor recommended reverse referral to urgent care in 43.6%. Our results demonstrate that the tool is safe and provides accurate patient screening, correctly distinguishing between those who should continue to wait for HED care and those for whom an urgent care center is adequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.