Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Anastasia Makhanova, James K McNulty, Lisa A Eckel, Larissa Nikonova, Jennifer A Bartz, Arial S Bloshinsky, Elizabeth A D Hammock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anastasia MakhanovaDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
James K McNultyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Lisa A EckelDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Larissa NikonovaDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Jennifer A BartzDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arial S BloshinskyDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Elizabeth A D HammockDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Maintaining relationship quality during the first few years can be difficult for many couples. We examined whether variability in the repeat-length polymorphism RS3 on the vasopressin receptor gene Methods: Newlywed couples ( Results: Across both approaches, results failed to support our predictions. In fact, the significant effects that did emerge were in the opposite direction from our predictions: people with at least one copy of allele 334 reported Discussion: Discrepancies between these findings and prior research illustrate the challenges of candidate gene studies with small sample sizes. Nevertheless, in offering a potential reconciliation between the discrepancies, we suggest that attending to relational phase may be critical to understanding the role of RS3 in couple functioning;

Indexed as

marital problemsmarriagepair bondingRS3 polymorphismvasopressin receptor gene

Identifiers

PMID40099024
PMCPMC11911472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.