ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Escalation and De-Escalation Strategies for Endocrine Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics, treatment and survival in de novo and metachronous metastatic breast cancer: a nationwide comparative analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- A prediction model for predicting relapsed-free survival of early-stage invasive breast cancer patients with hormone receptor positive based on Ki67, HER2 and TOP2A.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Trends in Combinatorial Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Across Six Cities in China(2016-2021).Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) greatly lowers the risk of recurrence and mortality in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC), more than 20% of patients may experience relapses within 10 years, often manifesting as incurable distant metastases. To improve outcomes, ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) added to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors like exemestane have shown significant disease-free survival (DFS) and, in some cases, overall survival (OS) benefits. CDK4/6 inhibitors, a cornerstone in metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (MBC), are now being explored in EBC. Trials with abemaciclib and ribociclib have shown promise in high-risk EBC. For BRCA-mutant patients, the PARP inhibitor olaparib, as demonstrated in the OlympiA trial, significantly improved invasive DFS and OS when used as adjuvant therapy for one year. Conversely, de-escalation strategies are also emerging. Recent studies suggest that younger premenopausal women with low-risk disease may safely interrupt ET after 18-30 months to pursue pregnancy. Additionally, genomic tumor profiling is widely utilized to decide on aggressiveness of adjuvant therapy of EBC. These advancements reflect a shift toward personalized adjuvant therapy, integrating targeted treatments like CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, optimizing ET with OFS, and balancing efficacy with quality of life through de-escalation strategies. This tailored approach aims to improve long-term outcomes for HR-positive EBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.