Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40099002›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2025

Immunotherapy response in immunosuppressed patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 183 patients.

Emily Gong, Lauren Zawacki, Xinyi Fan, Daniel S Hippe, Ankita A Menon, Allison J Remington, Kristina Lachance, Tomoko Akaike, Lisa Tachiki, Song Y Park and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Merkel cell carcinoma: current surgical approaches and multidisciplinary treatment].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily GongDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2740-3081
Lauren ZawackiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Xinyi FanClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Daniel S HippeClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ankita A MenonDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Allison J RemingtonDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kristina LachanceDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Tomoko AkaikeDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-6408
Lisa TachikiClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8057-8029
Song Y ParkDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-1821
Paul NghiemDepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2784-963X

Funding

Understand & overcome resistance to PD-1P01CA225517 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PAUL NGHIEM · 2019 to 2026
$22.7M
TRAINING IN CANCER BIOLOGY &TRANSPLANTATIONT32CA009515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCY ELLEN DAVIDSON, Effie W Petersdorf · 1985 to 2026
$16.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA225517NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer with poor outcomes in immunosuppressed patients. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieve ~60% response rates in immunocompetent MCC patients, their efficacy in immunosuppressed patients remains unclear due to exclusion from trials. This study compares ICI outcomes, safety and the impact of immunosuppression subtypes between these groups. Methods and analysis: This retrospective study analysed 183 advanced MCC patients on first-line ICIs from a Seattle-based data repository. Of these, 147 were immunocompetent, and 36 were immunosuppressed (chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) n=10, autoimmune disorders n=10, other haematologic malignancies n=9, solid organ transplants n=4 and HIV/AIDS n=3). Outcomes included objective response rate, disease progression, MCC-specific and overall survival probability, adjusted for age, sex and stage at ICI initiation. Results: Initial ICI response rates at 6 months were 50% in immunosuppressed and 61.5% in immunocompetent patients (HR=0.71, p=0.17). Immunosuppressed patients had higher risks of disease progression (2 years: 53.9% vs 42.1%, HR=1.65, p=0.05) and MCC-specific mortality (2 years: 38.7% vs 24.4%, HR=1.85, p=0.04). CLL patients (n=10) had a particularly low response rate (response rate: 20.0% vs 61.5%, HR=0.18, p=0.02) and high progression risk (2 years: 80.0% vs 42.1%, HR=4.09, p=0.01). Immunosuppressed patients faced higher rates of ICI toxicity (6-month risk: 51.6% vs 36.6%, HR=1.79, p=0.03). Conclusions: ICIs provide meaningful benefits to immunosuppressed MCC patients, though their response rates are lower, and progression risk is higher compared with immunocompetent patients.

Indexed as

ImmunomodulationImmunotherapySkin cancer (non-melanoma)

Identifiers

PMID40099002
PMCPMC11911694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.